Current:Home > ContactWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections -CoinMarket
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View
Date:2025-04-19 16:51:18
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (696)
Related
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Theater never recovered from COVID — and now change is no longer a choice
- Chaim Topol, the Israeli actor known for Tevye of Fiddler on the Roof, has died
- The Missouri House tightens its dress code for women, to the dismay of Democrats
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend reading, listening and viewing
- What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend viewing
- Roald Dahl's publisher responds to backlash by keeping 'classic' texts in print
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Natasha Lyonne on the real reason she got kicked out of boarding school
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- 2023 Oscars Guide: Original Song
- A collection of rare centuries-old jewelry returns to Cambodia
- Melting guns and bullet casings, this artist turns weapons into bells
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Ben Savage, star of '90s sitcom 'Boy Meets World,' is running for Congress
- Don't put 'The Consultant' in the parking lot
- Michelle Yeoh's moment is long overdue
Recommendation
Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
From viral dance hit to Oscar winner, RRR's 'Naatu Naatu' has a big night
A full guide to the sexual misconduct allegations against YouTuber Andrew Callaghan
All-Star catcher and Hall of Fame broadcaster Tim McCarver dies at 81
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
This is your bear on drugs: Going wild with 'Cocaine Bear'
Why I'm running away to join the circus (really)
'After Sappho' brings women in history to life to claim their stories